Royal Dutch Shell

Last edited by apocalypticbeef on July 11, 2008 - 11:02am
Company Snapshot: 

Royal Dutch Shell plc is a multinational oil company of British and Dutch origins. It is one of the largest private sector energy corporations in the world, and one of the six "supermajors" (vertically integrated private sector oil exploration, natural gas, and petroleum product marketing companies). The company's headquarters are in The Hague, Netherlands, with its registered office in London, United Kingdom (Shell Centre).

The company's main business is the exploration for and the production, processing, transportation and marketing of hydrocarbons (oil and gas). Shell also has a significant petrochemicals business (Shell Chemicals), and an embryonic renewable energy sector developing wind, hydrogen and solar power opportunities. Shell is incorporated in the UK with its corporate headquarters in The Hague, its tax residence is in Netherlands, and its primary listings on the London Stock Exchange and Euronext Amsterdam (only "A" shares are part of the AEX index).

Ownership status: 
Publicly traded
2008 Global Fortune 500 rank: 
3
Corporate accountability
Labor: 

Over 600 West African plantation workers sued Shell and other companies (Dow Chemical, Amvac and Dole Food Co.), alleging that the pesticide DBCP caused them to become sterile. DBCP was banned by EPA in 1979 because it causes sterility, cancer and birth defects. The lawsuit was filed by Raphael Metzger in California under the Alien Tort Claims Act -- a federal law allowing foreigners to seek redress in U.S. federal courts.

Environment and product safety: 

Climate Change

When it withdrew from the Global Climate Coalition in 1998 Shell wished to be seen as one of the pioneer corporations, taking climate change seriously. Even before it withdrew from the GCC, Shell had been attempting to cultivate this image. Shell has ambitious plans to increase extraction by 5 per-cent each year. Analysts predicted that Shell could scale back its growth target to 3 per-cent, the company refused to be drawn on a figure for longer-term production growth.

In 2000, Shell, together with Siemens began developing a pilot gas-fired power station in Norway, which will capture its Carbon Dioxide (CO2) emissions and pump the gas underground. There are both technical and ethical questions over the use of this unproven technology in combating climate change. CO2 injection will be used for what is known as "enhanced oil recovery" gas will be injected to increase the pressure of declining fields. In accepting the reality of climate change, Shell announced in 1989 that the company was going to increase the height of its giant "Troll" platform by 1 meter, to counter predicted rise in sea-level. The platform can be raised further if it becomes necessary over the proposed 70 year lifespan of the rig.

West of Shetland

Environmental campaigners have long opposed the opening of the so-called Atlantic-Margin or Atlantic-Frontier to oil exploration. Opposition was on the grounds of climate-change but also because this area of deep ocean, west of Shetland and further, beyond Rockall had previously been largely free of commercial activity. Most of Shell UK's production comes from the North Sea: Gas fields are mainly in the southern sector and oil comes from the more northerly fields, including the large Brent field. Companies which operate in the North Sea are aware that these areas are probably already past their peak and that production is likely to decline over the coming decades. Because no tax is payable on oil and gas from UK waters, the UK is a operating environment favored by companies, so these corporations have been looking for new reserves in the UK to replace declining North Sea production.

In November 1997 Shell was a partner with operator BP in the Foinaven field, 190km west of Shetland, the first Atlantic Margin field to come on-stream. But on the 6th of December 2000 Shell announced that it had completed an asset swap agreement under which it would part with its 28 per-cent interest in the BP-operated Foinaven field, plus its interests in discoveries and prospects in areas adjacent to Foinaven. In exchange Shell would acquire an interest in Sakhalin Energy Investment of Russia.

Renewable Energy

Shell is a partner in the Blyth offshore wind project in Northumberland. Industry analysts see this investment favorably, since unlike BPs investment in solar Shell already has expertise in off-shore operations which it can transfer to its renewables division. Measurable reductions in local environmental pollution at Shell facilities have been achieved relatively easily and have been good for public relations, but this disguises the fact that in the early 1990s Shell was regularly breaching its pollution consent limits (35 times in 1991) and as such had, in the UK at least, a statutory duty to improve environmental performance. It also ignores the reality that to reduce local pollution whilst simultaneously seeking new oil and gas is to fudge the pollution issue.

Oil Leak and Drilling Muds

Shell was less proficient in reducing local pollution in August 1989 when 150 tons of thick Venezuelan crude leaked from a Shell pipeline, into the River Mersey (UK). The spill caused a 20 mile slick and killed at least 300 sea birds, putting another 2000 at risk due to oil ingestion. The nearby New Brighton mussel beds were also contaminated. The incident was made worse because Shell, against the warnings of local police and councilors flushed the pipeline with lighter crude and water, in order to stop oil from solidifying and blocking the pipe.

The National Rivers Authority was not informed of the spill by Shell but by the local fire Brigade, two and a half hours after the event. If they had been notified earlier, the flushing attempts would have been prevented. The official Department of Energy report concluded that the pipe was badly corroded and that the monitoring equipment was so inadequate that it could not detect problems. Shell was fined one million pounds at Liverpool Crown Court, with costs of 6573 pounds - the largest ever fine in the UK for a pollution incident. After several further spills and leakages, and amidst mounting criticism of the refinery, the General Manager of the plant, Bob Brawn told employees, "If I was running this plant in the United States or in Canada I would be in jail by now".

Contamination also emanates from exploration and production. For example, in April 1989, there was a 50000 gallon leak of toxic drilling muds from Shell's North Cormorant oil field in the North Sea.

Better Britain Campaign

The now well established Shell Better Britain campaign (SBBC) is an attempt by Shell to win public support by funding "Communities in efforts to improve their local environment in a sustainable manner, from organic growing to cycle taxis".

However, the scheme has split environmental groups over the ethics of accepting such money, particularly since the scheme has been so successful in earning Shell the image of a good corporate citizen. For example, the judge who, in 1990 fined Royal Dutch/Shell Group one million pounds over an oil leak into the river Mersey (UK) the previous year (see above), commented that the fine would have been substantially higher if Shell had not had such a good record in conservation, the arts and other worthwhile causes.

As long ago as 1991, then campaigns director of Friends of the Earth: Andrew Lees criticized the Shell Better Britain campaign as being an example of corporations buying a green image rather than actually earning one. In 1989, Shell defeated a decision by Kent County Council (UK) to stop the company drilling in a classified Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty, and in 1990 the company decided to build a pipeline construction facility on Morrich More, a grade one Site of Special Scientific Interest and an EC (European Community) Protected Area, and the only breeding site in the UK of the whimbrel, a rare wading bird. In 1992, Shell began drilling 21 miles off the Sunderland coast, north east England. The area is close to 21 sites of special scientific interest (SSSI) and to Flamborough Head, a well known nesting site. Shell's contribution to Britain is distinctly mixed.

Human rights: 

In 1991 EIRIS (Ethical Investment Research Service) stated that Shell was operating in 24 Countries where extra-judicial executions or disappearances had been reported, 44 countries where torture has been reported (according to Amnesty International), 36 Countries where "official violence against citizens" was reported, and 26 countries which were holding prisoners of conscience. By 1999, following extensive public relations on the part of Shell, including the annual publication of "People, Planet and Profits, The Shell Report" EIRIS had revised its opinion of Shell, stating that "a number of companies such as Shell ... have now recognised ... the new emerging agenda".

Chad-Cameroon

Under pressure from human rights activists Shell withdrew from the 3.7 billion dollar Chad-Cameroon oil and pipeline project in 1999. The project will involve the development of more than 300 oil wells in southern Chad and the construction of a 1050km pipeline, southwards to Cameroon's Atlantic coast. The project could still go ahead and will likely be backed by ExxonMobil and Chevron. The project can only strengthen Chad's repressive regime and there are worries that it will lead to destruction of rivers and coastal rainforest. Shell's oil Exploration activity continues in less controversial off-shore Cameroon where, fortunately for Shell, it does not have to contend with indigenous communities blighted by oil.

Peru and Columbia

Shell mounted a similar retreat from Peru. In 1996 Shell Prospecting and Development (Peru) signed a licensing agreement with the Peruvian government for the Camisea project, controversial because exploration was to place in pristine rainforest, in an area inhabited by several vulnerable indigenous populations, including two of the world's last isolated nomadic peoples. Since 1996, Shell has found Gas along the Urubamba River in Peru but has pulled out of the Camisea project. Despite attempts to portray the project as a model of sustainable development, the company was unable to win the "green" stamp of approval from NGOs, without such support the cost of the project to Shell in public relations would have been too great.

Pakistan

Shell takes a keen interest in the potential for downstream marketing activities in the emerging markets of central Asia and the Indian subcontinent. Shell is also involved in exploration and production in Pakistan. This included the Dumbar concession, which covered exploration rights over most of the Kirthar National Park in the south-eastern Sind province. The concession was granted by the provincial government to a joint venture between Shell Pakistan and Premier Oil. Public controversy over oil exploration in such a sensitive, protected environment erupted after Pakistani "Sustainable Development Policy Institute" in Coalition with 8 other NGOs announced, in February 2001 that it was mounting a legal challenge to have the concession overturned.

In response to such bad press, and concerned for its reputation, Shell announced in May 2001 that "it was seeking to end its Pakistan joint venture with Premier Oil by proposing to swap its 49.9 per-cent stake in the joint venture for an increased holding of up to 28 per-cent in Premier's Bhit gas field elsewhere in Pakistan. Industry sources said that shell "was looking to lessen its exposure in exploration activities and the move could be part of the strategic decision".

Anti-competitive and consumer protection: 

North Sea

The British North Sea has been the scene of a number of serious incidents which have often led unions to criticize management's approach to health and safety. After a massive escape of gas in January 1989, on Shell's Delta platform in the Brent field, (east of Shetland) Shell was criticized for not informing HM coastguard of the incident. Independent experts believed that Shell was fortunate not to experience a disaster similar to that on Occidental's Piper-Alpha platform.

In 1992, half of Shell exploration-and-production's staff-management committee resigned, frustrated with the company's attitude. The union OILC which represents a large proportion of offshore workers in the British North Sea believes that nothing fundamental has changed since these incidents and that problems with health and safety are systemic. Health and safety is implemented by Shell as it is by other companies in a top down manner. Unions and workers are not adequately consulted and impossible, conflicting demands are made of employees: Work must be done, ever more quickly in the drive for efficiency but safety must not be compromised.

Political influence: 

Global Climate Coalition

Shell is a former member of the Global Climate Coalition (GCC). The coalition heavily lobbied governments and mounted persuasive advertising campaigns in the US to turn public opinion against concrete action on greenhouse gas emissions. In 1998 Shell followed BP and left the GCC. By early 2000 Texaco and others were joining the movement away from the GCC. While the GCC was an overt lobby against action on climate change, since it was sidelined, other lobby groups have come to the fore which are more subtle in their tactics.

World Business Council for Sustainable Development

As a multinational which attempts to maintain the ethical high ground, Shell takes a leading position within the World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). Senior members of Royal Dutch/Shell Group wear their WBCSD hat, for example at the UN's COP climate summits.

Business Roundtable

The president of Royal Dutch and Chairman of Shell are entitled to sit at the Business Roundtable, an association who examine public issues that affect the economy. The association, which represents over 200 companies, ran a series of newspaper advertisements timed to precede an address by President Clinton to its annual meeting in June 1997. The adverts called for a climate policy "balanced" between economy and environment. The roundtable's position is explained in Rush to Judgment: A Primer on Global Climate Change, available on the group's website.

Centre for European Policy Studies

Shell also holds a position within the Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS) which hosted a special meeting on climate change, on the eve of COP6 bis, the resumed international negotiations on the future of the Kyoto Protocol (Bonn, July 16-27, 2000). The meeting launched a new CEPS working party on "Emissions trading and the new EU climate-change policy" which will be chaired by Charles Nicholson of fellow oil giants BP.

International Chamber of Commerce and US Council for International Business

BP also belongs to the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) and the US Council for International Business (USCIB). The ICC heralds itself as "The only representative body that speaks with authority on behalf of enterprises from all sectors in every part of the world."

ICC promotes free trade and the market economy with the conviction that "trade is a powerful force for peace and prosperity". ICC aims to be a forum where business can agree voluntary rules to govern world trade in the hope that this image of responsible industry self-regulation will persuade governments not to interfere. It proved so successful in this that within a year of the creation of the United Nations, ICC was granted consultative status at the UN.

Shell in the United States, and over 300 other American corporations belong to USCIB who are involved in lobbying the US government. The council was founded in 1945 "to promote an open system of world trade, investment and finance". Other prominent members of the council include: BP, the American Petroleum Institute, Coca-Cola, Chevron (oil Co.), Dupont (see Corporate Watch profile), General Electric, General Motors, Ford, McDonalds, Mobil, Monsanto, Nestle USA, Philip Morris (tobacco), Texaco (oil) and Unilever. The USCIB is the US affiliate of the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) and the International Organisation of Employers (IOE). Most significantly USCIB chairs the expert-group of the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD).

European Chemical Industry Council

The company is a member of the European Chemical Industry Council who brand themselves as "both the forum and the voice of the European chemical industry." CEFIC represents, directly or indirectly, about 40,000 chemical companies in Europe, companies which account for more than 30 per-cent of world chemicals production. CEFIC represents large corporations such as Shell and represents smaller companies through the national chemical industry federations of 25 European countries.

The federation's offices are in Brussels, where CEFIC was incorporated in 1972 as "an international association with scientific objectives" but science is inseparable from politics and CEFIC lobbies the European Commission extensively on behalf of its members' interests. Perhaps most worrying is CEFICs position in support of the WTOs TRIPs agreement on intellectual property which will bring patent laws into new areas, allowing the patenting of natural resources as if they were new ideas.

Global Compact

A member of the Shell board was among the senior officers of 50 major companies present at the formal launch of the UN Global Compact on July 26, 2000. The compact was first mooted by UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan in a speech to the Davos World Economic Forum in January 1999. The compact between the UN and business aims to uphold values in human rights, labor standards and environmental practice. The Compact is open for adherence by any company, large or small, no formalities are involved and no formal proof is required that the companies are upholding the compact but companies are asked to demonstrate their adherence by taking corporate action to support the values of the Compact.

The European Roundtable of Industrialists

The European Roundtable of Industrialists (ERT), which includes Phil Watts of "Shell Transport and Trading" is a club of 48 captains of industry, drawn from the largest European multinationals. With privileged access to EU and national decision-makers the Roundtable has been at the forefront in promoting industry self-regulation over government-enforceable mechanisms. ERT Environment Working Group released a report on climate change in mid-October 2000, prior to COP6 in the Hague: "Climate Change: How Government and Industry can Work Together".

Location(s)

Headquarters
Carel van Bylandtlaan 30
The Hague, 2596
Netherlands

Royal Dutch Shell

History

The "Royal Dutch Company for the Exploitation of Petroleum Wells in the Netherlands East Indies" was registered in the Hague in 1890. The name was abbreviated in 1949 to Royal Dutch Petroleum Company. Shell was first registered in London in 1897 by the brothers Marcus and Sam Samuel as The Shell Transport and Trading Company, Ltd.

The first Royal-Dutch/Shell joint operating company, the Asiatic Petroleum Company, was established in 1903 and in 1907, Royal-Dutch and Shell merged all of their operations; 60% Royal-Dutch; 40% Shell. Despite merging their interests the companies remain separate: One can buy shares in Royal-Dutch or in Shell-Transport, but not in the Group as such. In 1912, the Group founded the American Gasoline Company to sell gasoline along the Pacific Coast and Roxanna Petroleum to buy oil in Oklahoma. US operations have grown so that in 2000, 34 per-cent of earnings from exploration and production and 4 per-cent of earnings from oil product sales were generated in the USA.

Shell's Chemical division has grown since 1928 when, Shell Development Company was established to identify chemical products which could be made from refinery by-product gases. One year later, Shell Chemical Company was chartered to manufacture these products. In 1972 Shell pioneered CO2 injection, as an enhanced recovery technique, a process it is now branding as a solution to climate change.

Shell had already suffered a blow earlier in 1995 when in April, Greenpeace activists occupied the Brent Spar oil platform which had come to the end of is working life and was due to be dumped at sea. The platform contained tonnes of toxic drilling muds, plus oil residues and radioactive waste. Shell's relationship with the UK Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) ensured that it got approval for the dumping - indeed the DTI refused to accept written protests from Greenpeace. Shell said it had submitted an objective view from "independent" scientists but a number of reports are alleged to have been hidden or destroyed. One of these predicted that the Spar would break up on its way down to its intended resting place 150m below the surface, dispelling its waste into the water column.

After a three year campaign by Greenpeace the Brent Spar was, in November 1998, broken up and incorporated into a new ferry terminal in the harbour of Mekjarvik, Norway. Since this decision, European countries surrounding the North Sea have invoked a moratorium on such dumping of platforms, avoiding a dangerous precedent for the misuse of our seas.

In March of 1997, Shell, Texaco and Saudi Aramco announced, a hugely significant joint venture that would combine their Eastern and Gulf Coast United States refining and marketing businesses. From July 2000 Jeroen van der Veer replaced Maarten van den Bergh as president of Royal-Dutch and in 2001 Phil Watts replaced Sir Mark Moody Stuart as chairman of the board of Shell transport and Trading.